ludimagister

Freely ignore it, that is the point of relativism, it is an ought of one person, but could be the shared ought of many… Its ‘oughtness’ not owed to logic, but to indwelling conviction

If that is so, then there was no fallacy in the neo-nihilism video; since you’ve just acknowledged that the “ought” of relativism is only relevant to relativists—therefore not absolute or objective.